from feb 20th, 2025

Maybe it is all true. Maybe it is all true. 

I need more guidance

I need more specifics - and yet I must breathe. I must let go of control. I must know that it will all happen in time. 

I know what I have been told. I must not doubt this. I struggle with the understanding of the difference between ego and spiritual knowing. The ego must let go of timing, I guess. 

We must simply release. Knowing nothing depends on time, but energy. Things must happen in order. One thing happens, and then another. 

Do I sound crazy if I tell you that I was tripping on leap day in 2020 and my spirit guides told me that I must help end capitalism now in this lifetime? That I must be able to bring hope to the people that it is possible, for this is the only way for it to happen. For people to believe it is possible. 

For people to understand it is true. 

We cannot continue living like this- and the main argument for it is that we do not have to live like this. We, the global human species, amongst billions and trillions of other beings on this planet, and the planet herself, do not have to be trapped in the darkness. We do not have to be trapped in the fear. We must believe together, collectively, that this is possible. We must breathe, collectively. We must dance, and sing, and heal our neighbors, and heal our selves, and heal the land, and to let our neighbors heal us, and ourselves heal us, and let the land heal us. As a wise prayer leader said this week, the soil still knows how to heal. 

The movement work is possible. And I believe it can be done more quickly than anyone expects. 

I don’t know if this is ego taking the reigns, or if it is the mission I have been sent here with- but I know that it is possible. I know that people are tired, tired, tired. Killing each other, stealing land, constantly looking for more more more- is exhausting. It is the essence of unsustainability. This is why the time is now. 

It is the road to inevitable crash- and we have reached the time where this is not simply a theoretical matter. Nor has it ever been, for it was not theoretical to the people starved by colonizer-created famine. It has not been theoretical for the people of Gaza, constantly terrorized and brutally killed and displaced by Zionist rule. 

This is no way to be a species. This is no way to exist. This power hungry darkness will not rule forever. For, in this hunger, there is a better way. Replacing this desire for power and control, that stems only from fear, with love. Love of each moment. Love of ourselves. Love of the body we are existing in for this short time on earth. 

If you are reading this, dear earthling, my contemporaries, my loves, you will know- humans are not Infinite beings- we live, for a time, and we also die. 

I am astonished that anyone would want to waste such a precious opportunity. 

To be alive, to express love. To appreciate, to live without fear- to live in joy.  

This Earth, Earth as we are watching it, currently watching Trump’s America play out during time tracked by Jesus Years, needs a cracking open. The love must be let in.

If I am to conceptualize love as a scientifically studied energy, I would conceptualize the matter similarly to the properties of the energy form of heat or light. 

There is no way to calculate the speed of darkness. You cannot measure cold. 

There is simply presence and absence of such properties- therefore, it is impossible to “get rid of” darkness, or cold- the state of these are only changed by the entering of light and heat. 

This is why there is no true fight to be had against the end of America, against the crumbling capitalist system, against the last gasps of the terrorizing colonialists and white supremacists that seemingly seek to own every last corner of the globe. 

The only way to “fight” this “enemy” is to instead organize ourselves around an upwards movement of love. 

There are many reasons why Kamala did not defeat trump, why the democratic party’s argument did not appeal to voters. 

But I would argue a massive reason for this is because they did not frame their campaign as a “fight for”, but as a “fight against”

(Trying to find origin of previous quote thing) (following are from “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu)

And “To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill”

“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." Sun Tzu

A force that has no ground to stand on of its own, but simply argues against another party or idea will not gain much ground to fight on. Fighting against is a loosing battle and a poor strategy for any duel. In an ideological battle, there is not one side that has an idea and one side that says “your idea is wrong” 

There should be two sides (at least two) that each have ideas of their own- concrete ideas, plans, visions for the future, that convey a clear choice between two options - not simply the idea of “not them” 

To speak specifically for a moment, the democratic Biden-then-Kamala campaign did not campaign in a way so as to promote a true vision for the future so much as they made it clear they did not want to loose power. 

The simple fact of phrasing a campaign slogan as “We’re not going back” instead of “We’re moving forward” (or any other language to the same effect of moving forward or new ideas) causes a massive shift in the tone of the campaign. People now have fear brought in, just from this slogan, by the idea of “Going back” being brought into the picture. Fear is not an inspiring or motivating emotion, unless you count fighting, fleeing or freezing to be motivating (while they may be action, I would argue it is preferable to not constantly have the fear state triggered if not necessary) 

This critical misstep in the Democratic Party is a reflection of their treatment towards the people they claim to represent that goes back decades. This idea that people will fall in line with their ideals, without them having to truly fight to make a change for the better while in office, is a tired and dangerous notion. 

I do believe capitalism can end in our lifetimes. I do believe that the global system of oppression can be lifted, perhaps slowly but surely (if not all at once), in our lifetimes. In these next few decades, we have the chance to build a different way. We have the technology, truly, to build a different way. The level of access to technology that we currently have is enough to organize on a global scale. Hell, its enough to go to the moon and back and more, so I do truly believe that we have to potential, now on earth, to see things shift. 

Astrologically, the stars are in a similar place to where they were during the French Revolution. And indeed, our cycles of technology mirror this as well. Humans, a printing species, gained widespread access to mechanized printing presses in Europe shortly preceding the French Revolution. This is no surprise, and while correlation cannot prove causation, we can assume from history that the ability to distribute ideas (in the form of highly shareable printed text) more quickly- simply due to the fact of having a more speedy way of creating copies of such ideas - meant that more humans were able to learn and share ideas across distance and time. Because of this, there were also what one might call negative side effects, especially as the printing presses were large and expensive and owners of such machines were easily able to control what was and was not printed and distributed widely. 

What was distributed widely after this time? Besides the Bible, there were a few hundred years in Europe post-printing press introduction where the second most widely distributed book was a manual (if you will) on how burning witches, which led to a scourge of witch burnings and trials across the continent. 

Despite this research early texts that preceded the French Revolution, how it came to be, etc., there were also texts that led to the inevitable overthrow of certain forms of power, specially kings and other singular people that attempted to rule over the masses. 

I believe that we are in a parallel time to this revolution, only now on a global scale. I believe that humans are not meant to live in separate, often-warring states, with much of a country’s life force dedicated to fighting to keep it (ex. Military, etc). 

I believe instead we are meant to live in harmony with the land, the many other beings on this planet, and each other. We can remain connected globally through this system of electrical wiring that is so similar to the mycelium and the ways that trees talk to each other - but we can let go of the need for power and control and spread love across the earth. 

We can have a globally interconnected flourishing species, interconnected with all other species, and we will be better off. (If one is to argue that a life in harmony could be called “better”, for what is good or bad is heretofore unknown) 

Trees use mycelium underground to redistribute sugars and supplies for life to the other trees near them, and we could do the same as humans. We already know that we have not only enough food to feed everyone on the planet, if distributed equally, but we also have enough houses and space to make sure everyone has a place to live that is safe and comfortable. 

If we were to utilize the technology of the internet in this wholly positive way, in the way that trees use mycelium to send messages and nutrients to each other to aid in mutual thriving, we too could put our electrical signaling systems to use for this same purpose. 

We simply could have an online system that allows for everyone in an area to communicate if they have leftovers, extras, or a need to be filled. I know we have the ability to make sure this were the case. 

But we must imagine this in a world that is completely outside of the construct we have been living under- the constructed Way of Being that the capitalists would love to see us embody as our own, as our only option. 

But nine to five is not truth. Forty Hours is made up. Weekends are a construct (that workers fought hard to win, mind you.) 

There are other ways of existing. There are myriad ways to construct a day, a moon cycle, a season. Each day can be different, depending on the season. The idea of “Labor to Live” or “Earning one’s keep” must be thrown out the window. No one should be made to “earn my keep” on earth. I do believe we have responsibilities as beings on this planet, but they vary for each person in practice. research more about disability rights movement, etc There is no need to force everyone into the same mold of 40 hours. 

Plus, we know that forty hours in a workplace does not mean the same thing for everyone. In many professions right now, especially in the white collar workplace, much of the worker’s time is spent looking busy or filling time, time that they are contractually obligated to spend at work, even if they do not have an adequate amount of work to do during this time. The book bullshit jobs by david graeber elaborates in great depth on this theory, and I would highly recommend it to anyone. 

We know it is possible to live in a world where the work necessary to be done is taken care of in a reasonable and manageable amount of time that still gives humans a chance to live the rest of their lives. Some countries are currently somewhat closer to this balance, with more vacation time guaranteed or shorter working hours regulated, but there is still much work to be done.

We need each other